---

Global companies can’t afford to treat hiring like a quick admin task, especially when building remote teams across borders. In South Africa, getting the setup wrong can damage not only your reputation but also your bottom line. Here’s what global employers need to know from both sides of the hiring table.

---

By Anton van Heerden, Managing Director at DNA EOR

I speak to CEOs and HR leaders every week, and while many are excited about hiring abroad, they’re also confused. The rules change from country to country, and the risk of getting it wrong is very real.

Remote work has made global hiring easier but not necessarily safer. As more companies tap into international talent markets, they often overlook one crucial piece: compliance.

A Report byVelocity Global in April 2025, warns of “invisible employment,” where businesses bypass proper legal frameworks and misclassify international workers as contractors. The report emphasizes that this trend carries significant compliance, financial, and reputational risks, especially as global hiring accelerates. Misclassifying a full-time contributor as an independent contractor is a legal and trust issue. It creates uncertainty, exposes companies to penalties, and can shake a new hire’s confidence in their decision.

While HR teams might think, “We’ll figure it out later,” your new hire is already wondering if they’ve made a mistake.

Part 1: From the Candidate’s Side: What It Feels Like to Be Misclassified

“I really hope I made the right decision.”

That’s what a South African data analyst told me recently, two weeks into starting a remote role with a company based in Europe. The offer looked legit and the role was exciting. But the contract? It was a generic freelance agreement. No benefits. No local protections. No clarity on how she’d be paid.

And that’s the problem.

When companies hire across borders, especially into countries like South Africa, and default to contractor agreements out of convenience or cost-cutting, it often leaves new hires confused and unprotected.

Sure, the gig economy has made freelancing feel normal. But in this case, she wasn’t a freelancer. She worked full-time hours, reported to a manager, joined all-hands calls, and took direction like any other employee.

It felt like a full-time job – it just didn’t come with the security of one.

And she’s not alone.

Globally, more professionals are speaking out about poor hiring practices, especially when international offers turn into legal grey zones. According to Jack Hammer’s executive search insights, candidates across seniority levels are walking away from offers if the hiring process feels disjointed or disrespectful. Add uncertainty about employment status, and the risk is even higher.

In South Africa, with high unemployment and an oversupply of skilled professionals, many are afraid to question red flags. But that doesn’t mean they’re not watching. They’re Googling your company. They’re reading Glassdoor reviews, and speaking to potential peers on LinkedIn chats. They’re asking: “If this is how I’m treated now, what happens if something goes wrong?”

If you’re a global company, that first impression matters. It tells candidates how seriously you take their rights and whether you’re the kind of employer they can trust with their future.

Part 2: From the Employer’s Side: What It Costs to Get It Wrong

As someone who speaks to global business leaders every week, I get it. You want to move fast. You found the right person in South Africa, they’re keen, and you just want to send the contract and get them started.

So, you go with what feels easy: an independent contractor agreement.

But here’s the problem: if they act like an employee and you treat them like an employee, then under South African labour law, they probably are one.

Misclassifying a full-time hire as a contractor isn’t a technicality; it is also a legal risk. It can lead to:

• Backdated tax and UIF contributions
• Penalties for non-compliance under the Basic Conditions of Employment Act (BCEA)
• Reputational damage in the eyes of candidates, regulators, and the public

We’ve seen companies fined, flagged, or even investigated because of poor classification decisions. That risk increases exponentially when you’re hiring in multiple countries without local expertise.

It’s not just about tax. It’s about trust.

Candidates want to know that you respect their rights under local law: paid leave, fair notice periods, maternity benefits, and proper payroll. And if you’re not offering those, while your local team gets them, what message are you sending?

The Entity vs. EOR Decision

Many companies assume they must set up a local entity to hire compliantly. And yes, that’s one path. But it’s expensive and time-consuming.

Setting up a South African entity involves registration with the CIPC, SARS, UIF, and the Compensation Fund, as well as complying with BBEEE laws. You’ll need local bank accounts, legal advisors, ongoing compliance, and payroll systems. It can take months, and that’s before you onboard your first hire.

Many growing companies choose an Employer of Record (EOR) model instead. A good EOR acts as the legal employer in-country, handles the employment contract, registers and pays tax correctly, and ensures compliance with local laws. Your hire works for you in practice, but we take on the legal and administrative burden.

But not all EORs are created equal.

When leaders search for a provider, they often feel overwhelmed. There are so many global platforms, but not all of them have deep expertise in South African labour law. Some will try to apply one-size-fits-all solutions across multiple countries, and that’s where things break.

What do smart companies do?

They ask for referrals. They read reviews. They look for providers who don’t just have a platform, but a team who understands the local landscape and can guide them through every step. From advising on job specs and setting up payroll, to making sure leave policies comply with the BCEA.

In fact, one of our clients said what finally swayed them was reading our real-world blogs on independent contractors and misclassification.  “It felt like someone finally explained the risk in plain English.”

“We looked at EOR platforms, but they just don’t talk back. With DNA, I pick up the phone and get to speak to Anton or Natalie. They bring real solutions, not chatbots.” – Ben Tellez, Business Director, Talent Force Global

Six Months Later…

That same client? Six months in, they’ve hired five more South Africans through DNA EOR. The onboarding process takes less than 48 hours. Their remote team is fully compliant. And now, as they expand into other markets, they’re wishing we had a presence there, too.

That’s the power of getting it right from day one.

Final Word

Hiring across borders shouldn’t be about filling a seat. It is about protecting your company, your people, and your reputation.

If you’re using independent contractors in South Africa, ensure they’re truly independent. If you’re unsure, speak to an expert because getting this wrong doesn’t only lead to fines. It leads to distrust. And when trust is broken, it’s hard to build a great team.

If you want to do it right – legally, quickly, and without the guesswork – there are people who can help.

And yes, we’re one of them.